Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.608/2023

Case between P.I. Radhakrishnan vs Manivarnan E.M. regarding Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction and Mandatory injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 19 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, P.I. Radhakrishnan, is the absolute owner of certain land and has filed a suit against the defendant, Manivarnan E.M., to obtain a mandatory injunction for vacating the premises after the defendant defaulted on rental payments. The plaintiff requires the premises for business expansion.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must vacate the premises and issued a permanent prohibitory injunction against him trespassing into the property. The plaintiff is entitled to receive costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the premises and permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved ownership and the urgency of needing the property for business purposes.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is hereby directed by a decree of mandatory injunction to vacate the petition schedule room. 2. The defendant is hereby restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint schedule property and committing any waste therein interfering and obstructing peaceful occupation and enjoyment of plaint schedule property by plaintiff and committing waste therein.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

P.I. Radhakrishnan (59 years) Pranavam House, Maradu, Poonithura Village and P.O., Ernakulam District­682038

Defendants

Manivarnan E.M. (32 years) Madurima House, Kannanthrikovil Lane, Thripunithura P.O., Ernakulam District­682301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is hereby directed by a decree of mandatory injunction to vacate the petition schedule room.
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby directed by a decree of mandatory injunction to vacate the petition schedule room.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is hereby restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint schedule property and committing any waste therein interfering and obstructing peaceful occupation and enjoyment of plaint schedule property by plaintiff and committing waste therein.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get costs of suit from defendant and from his assets.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get costs of suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Property tax receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A1 is the property tax receipts dated 16.05.2023 (2 in Nos.)
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Objection
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A2 is the photocopy of the objection dated 27.05.2019, marked subject to provisions of Indian Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Court Proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A3 is the copy of the proceedings dated 30.05.2023 in RCP 8.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A4 is the copy of lawyer’s notice dated 01.06.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The plaintiff proved plaint allegations on the strength of chief affidavit.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 06/01/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases