Case Summary
Philomina Varkey and others filed a suit against Saramma and others. The case involves issues addressed in a compromise agreement between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on a compromise agreement. The previous order was vacated.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The judgment was based on the mutually agreed compromise.
The judgment was based on the mutually agreed compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The judgment was based on the mutually agreed compromise.
The judgment was based on the mutually agreed compromise.
Supporting Evidence
Compromise agreement attached with IA 5/2024 shall form part of the decree.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit having come up before me for hearing on 23.11.2024... Suit is decreed based on the order in IA 5/2024.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Philomina Varkey
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o late Varkey
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shiny
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o late Varkey
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sabu
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o late Varkey
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shibu
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o late Varkey
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saramma
- Party Age
- 86
- Relation
- W/o late Ouso
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joshi
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o late Ouso
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vakkachan
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o late Ouso
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jacob
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o late Ouso
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement attached with IA 5/2024
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Blesson Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jijo Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Babu Cherukara
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nelson J Manayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.R.Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.E.Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.E.Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Exparte
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed based on the order in IA 5/2024.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed based on the order in IA 5/2024.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Set Aside
Description:
Order in IA 1070/2016 is hereby vacated.
Evidence:
Order in IA 1070/2016 is hereby vacated.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise agreement
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Form part of the decree.
Reference:
IA 5/2024
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Philomina Varkey et al vs Saramma et al regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Philomina Varkey et al vs Saramma et al regarding a civil suit