Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 564/2022

Case between Philomina @ Philo et al vs M.V.Antony et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by Philomina @ Philo and others, were involved in a suit against defendants M.V.Antony and others. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. No proof affidavit filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Philomina @ Philo
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sisily George
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony P.G
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varghese P.G
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tresa Daliya P.G
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V.Antony
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V.Raphel
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Celine Antony
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Merina M.A
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Brigit M.A
Party Age
24
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.R.Jayalatha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amrutha Divakar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Ushakumari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.B.Dayal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishna Dayal K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Philomina @ Philo et al vs M.V.Antony et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Philomina @ Philo et al vs M.V.Antony et al regarding Suit dismissed for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won