Case Summary
The case involves petitions filed by the 8th defendant, Russel Paul, seeking documents for forensic analysis related to disputed signatures in an agreement for sale. The plaintiffs dispute the genuineness of those signatures.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petitions were not specific about the documents containing admitted signatures and thus could not be entertained.
The court found that the petitions were not specific about the documents containing admitted signatures and thus could not be entertained.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, I.A.No. 12/2025 and I.A.No. 13/2025 stands dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Philomina Joseph (75 years)
Kanayannor Taluk, Elamkulam Village, Asokha Road, Naduvila Mulloth (Kappatti) now residing at Padinjal Kallamparam Road, Vattekkunnam, Edappally, Pin code – 682 017
Manoj Joseph (50 years)
31/1249-46/1234 (Kappatti), Ferozgandhi Line, Moolikandam Junction, Vaduthala, Ernakulam, Pin code – 682 035
T. Dalton Joseph (48 years)
10/208 E White House, P R Nagar, Manjummal, Ernakulam, Pin code - 683 501
Denny Franciz (45 years)
Nedumparambil House, Nettuur, Ernakulam, Pin code - 682 040
Philomina Blessy (41 years)
Hoysala Nester Flat No. 1116, 10783 - A 218, VSNL Road, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Pin code - 682 030
Defendants
Russel Paul (48 years)
Naduvanila Mulloth house, Kappati (Opposite to Bharath Petrol Pump) Kanayannur Taluk, Edapally South Village, Vennala Desom, Puthiya Road, Pin code - 682 028
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petitions I.A No. 12/2025 and I.A No. 13/2025 sought directions for production of documents and forensic analysis of signatures.
Evidence:
I am therefore of the opinion that the petitions herein cannot be positively entertained are liable to be dismissed and are dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Agreement for sale
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
The court considered the agreement for sale dated 15.05.2018 for determining the genuineness of signatures.
Reference:
null
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court referenced the disputes raised by the parties regarding the genuineness of signatures.
Reference:
null