Case Summary
The petitioner is represented by an advocate and a notice was served to the respondent who was not present. The case involves an EA which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
null
Final Judgment
No
The EA was allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- BIJU C R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Bar Registration
- 1753
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ramesan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
EA allowed
Evidence:
EA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
null
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between #Petitioner Name vs #Respondent Name regarding null
Case Code Year
Case between #Petitioner Name vs #Respondent Name regarding null