Case Summary
Peter Rubin is the decree holder and Pushpakaran K.S is the judgment debtor. The case involves the satisfaction of a decree and the petition has been closed after delivery was effected.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the decree was satisfied and the execution petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery effected. Decree satisfied. E.P closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Peter Rubin
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pushpakaran K.S
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.R Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. S Latha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sree Rekha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kurian Maxie
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sangeetha K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Delivery effected and decree satisfied.
Evidence:
Decree satisfied.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Peter Rubin vs Pushpakaran K.S regarding decree satisfaction.
Case Code Year
Case between Peter Rubin vs Pushpakaran K.S regarding decree satisfaction.