Case Summary
The Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank filed a petition against Peranthan Kummarampil. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not present for the enquiry.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The EP was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not present for the enquiry.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner is not present. Not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Peranthan Kummarampil
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jiji.J.D.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Not mentioned
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Not mentioned
Evidence:
Petitioner is not present. Not ready for enquiry. Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017