Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1303/2019

Case between Perumal Pillai vs Sreenivasan Raveendran et al regarding dismissal of a suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-10
Duration
approximately-5 years 10 days
Case Code No.
1303
Case Closed
Mon, 03/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Perumal Pillai, filed a suit against the defendants, including Sreenivasan Raveendran and his legal heirs. The court found the plaintiff absent and dismissed the suit due to lack of representation and filed documents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to provide necessary representations.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and failure to provide necessary representations.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Perumal Pillai
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreenivasan Raveendran
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarojam
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabu
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kowdiar S Mohandas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mridul John Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Laxmi.S.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Akarsh.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Linchu.S.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Raghi Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Pallichal.S.Aswakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Meppukada.S.Jayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 03/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won