EXECUTION PETITION No. 32 OF 2015

Case between Peringottukara Namboodiri Yogakshema Sabha, Credit & Investment Ltd. vs Rukhiya regarding execution of decree

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.

Order Date

2018-09-26

Duration

5 years

Case Closed

Wed, 09/26/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Peringottukara Namboodiri Yogakshema Sabha, Credit & Investment Ltd., sought execution of a decree against the respondent, Rukhiya.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief

Interim Order

The court accepted the petition filed for the execution of the decree and recorded full satisfaction, resulting in the closure of the Execution Petition.

Judgment Favored

Petitioner

Relief Granted

Full satisfaction recorded

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The court accepted the petition filed for the execution of the decree and recorded full satisfaction, resulting in the closure of the Execution Petition.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed u/o 21 Rule 54 & 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Advanced as per order in EA 234/18. Razi filed on IA 235/18. Accepted. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Peringottukara Namboodiri Yogakshema Sabha, Credit & Investment Ltd.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rukhiya
Relation: D/o Mohammed Kutty

Plaintiffs Documents

Order in EA 234/18, Razi filed on IA 235/18

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. M.Neelakandan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Smt. Anjana.) V.T.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. E.K.Noushad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution of Decree

Outcome: Full satisfaction recorded

Description:

Execution of decree against respondent

Evidence: