Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 36/2013

Case between P.Damkumar vs Muhammed Fazil Veettu Valappil et al regarding default in payment

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2013-07-01
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 16 days
Case Code No.
36
Case Closed
Mon, 07/01/2013 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.Damkumar, as the decree holder, filed a petition against Muhammed Fazil Veettu Valappil and others for non-payment, leading to the dismissal of the petition due to default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for default due to non-payment and failure to issue the required notice to respondent No.2.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to non-payment and failure to issue the required notice to respondent No.2.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.Damkumar
Relation
Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Fazil Veettu Valappil
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subrahmanian Manalakkat
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandran Vazhakkannadi
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suresh.A.Alingal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Muhammed Fazil Veettu Valappil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Subrahmanian Manalakkat
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Chandran Vazhakkannadi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Default Judgment
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the petition due to default for non-payment and failure to issue notice
Evidence:
No batta paid to issue R37 notice to respondent No.2 on last 4 posting dates. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2013

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 02/15/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/01/2013 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary vs Hamza Poozhithara et al regarding default judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Secretary vs Mohammed Kaliyattu Parambil regarding unknown
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jabir.P.K. regarding maintainability
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Secretary vs Madathil Mohamed et al regarding petition dismissal
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won