Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.770/2022

Case between P.D. Antony vs Mercy Joseph et al regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.D. Antony and others filed a suit against Mercy Joseph and others for recovery of an amount from the defendants' assets. The parties entered into a mediation agreement to partition a property they are jointly interested in.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed as per the terms of the mediation agreement that was accepted by the court, involving property partition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property as per mediation agreement
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed as per the terms of the mediation agreement that was accepted by the court, involving property partition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties entered into an agreement voluntarily during mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties entered into an agreement voluntarily during mediation.
Supporting Evidence
I am convinced that the parties have entered into the agreement voluntarily. The terms of the agreement are lawful and hence the mediation agreement is accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.D. Antony
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Siby Antony
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Giby Antony
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mercy Joseph
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul Joseph
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siji Joseph
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saju Joseph
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soji Tomy
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blossom Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas John Ambooken
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajeev Kumar B.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Millu Dandapani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rameez Nooh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.D. Antony vs Mercy Joseph et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between P.D. Antony vs Mercy Joseph et al regarding partition of property

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won