Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 49 of 2023

Case between Paulson Paulose et al vs M/s. Blue Ocean et al regarding a civil suit

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-04-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Paulson Paulose, Petson Paulose, and Philomina @ Valsa Paulose, who filed a suit against the defendants M/s. Blue Ocean and its partners. The suit was decreed based on a joint compromise petition by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application to delete the fifth defendant from the suit. The suit was decreed based on a compromise agreement between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application to delete the fifth defendant from the suit. The suit was decreed based on a compromise agreement between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Terms are found lawful and enforceable.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement entered into the parties in IA 11/2024 and it shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paulson Paulose
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Petson Paulose
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Philomina @ Valsa Paulose
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Blue Ocean
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul Antony
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu Antony
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jibin John
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venkiteswara Mallan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.M Binitha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Krishnamoorthy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sneha Rose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aruna P.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sumitha.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement entered into the parties in IA 11/2024 and it shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paulson Paulose et al vs M/s. Blue Ocean et al regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Paulson Paulose et al vs M/s. Blue Ocean et al regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won