Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.504/2010

Case between Paul @ Ouso Paul vs St. Antony’s Church et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-02
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 12/02/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Paul @ Ouso Paul filed a suit against St. Antony’s Church and others. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was not present and had shown no interest in proceeding. As a result, the case was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was not present and had shown no interest in proceeding. As a result, the case was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was not present and had shown no interest in proceeding.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paul @ Ouso Paul
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St. Antony’s Church, Vaduthala represented by its Vicar Fr. Paul Thundiyil
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St. Antony’s Church, Vaduthala represented by its Vicar Fr. Antony Cheriakadavil
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P J Joseph
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raphael T A
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Francis Kurisinkal
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K R Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M S Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
L Aloysious Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K A Shaji Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amal M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Riyan Augustine Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
Hence court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paul @ Ouso Paul vs St. Antony’s Church et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Paul @ Ouso Paul vs St. Antony’s Church et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/02/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won