Case Summary
Paul K Mathew is the plaintiff in this case. The case revolves around a dispute with the defendants that was settled out of court, leading the plaintiff not to pursue the suit further.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed based on the plaintiff's memo stating that the dispute was settled out of court and the plaintiff is not entitled to relief from the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, in the light of above facts and circumstances the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Paul K Mathew
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jijo Peter
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rakthnakara Rao
- Party Age
- 62
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Harun Sydhu
- Party Age
- 58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joby Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ullas Madhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aleena Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff is not entitled to get any reliefs from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is not entitled to get any relief from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paul K Mathew vs Jijo Peter, Rakthnakara Rao, Harun Sydhu regarding settlement of a dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Paul K Mathew vs Jijo Peter, Rakthnakara Rao, Harun Sydhu regarding settlement of a dispute
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement