Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 252 OF 2015

Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Parayil Mammu et al regarding declaration

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-09-16
Duration
2 years
Case Closed
Sat, 09/16/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pathummu Umma filed a suit seeking declaration, but due to lack of representation, the suit was dismissed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed by the court due to the absence of representation from the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court due to the absence of representation from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Suit for declaration. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for declaration. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pathummu Umma
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parayil Mammu's wife
Party Age
47
Relation
Wife of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khamarunnisa
Party Age
30
Relation
Child of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
24
Relation
Child of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shafeek
Party Age
22
Relation
Child of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thoufeek
Party Age
20
Relation
Child of
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E.M.Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.Shanmughan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking declaration
Evidence:
Suit for declaration. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Declaration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Parayil Mammu et al regarding declaration
Case Code Year
Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Parayil Mammu et al regarding declaration

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 09/16/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 09/16/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 09/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 09/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vineeshkumar et al vs Kumaran regarding compliance with High Court directions
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vineesh Kumar et al vs Subrahmanian et al regarding failure to file affidavit
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Unknown Unknown
Case between K.Muhammed Basheer vs K.Sheeba et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Decree Plaintiff Won
Case between V.K.Savithry Amma vs Marakkar et al regarding unknown
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won