Case Summary
Pathummakutty is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against the defendants, which include government officials. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pathummakutty
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Deputy Thahsildar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Village Officer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit is one for injunction.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent, Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pathummakutty vs The Deputy Thahsildar et al regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Pathummakutty vs The Deputy Thahsildar et al regarding injunction.