Case between Pathrose et al vs Poulose et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Pathrose and George, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Poulose and Kuriakose, concerning a pathway that is part of the property shared among family members. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants are trying to interfere with their right to use the pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court decreed that the defendants are permanently restrained from encroaching the plaintiffs' pathway and from causing any damage to it. The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs as the defendants admitted to their claims.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Permanent prohibitory injunction against encroaching the pathway and causing damage.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The court decreed that the defendants are permanently restrained from encroaching the plaintiffs' pathway and from causing any damage to it. The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs as the defendants admitted to their claims.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted to the plaintiffs' claims in their written statements.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants admitted to the plaintiffs' claims in their written statements.

Supporting Evidence

The defendants entered appearance and they filed written statements admitting the plaintiff's claim.

Judgment Evidence:

The defendants and their men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from encroaching plaint B schedule road in which plaint C schedule forms a part. Further the defendants are to be restrained from reducing the width of said pathway and to commit any waste or to cause any damage to the plaint B schedule way.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Pathrose
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: George
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Poulose
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kuriakose
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M/s. M Y Saju, Surendran P K and Haritha Hariharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P.P. Rajesh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and their men from encroaching the B schedule road

Evidence:

The defendants and their men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from encroaching plaint B schedule road in which plaint C schedule forms a part.

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Restraining the defendants from reducing the width of the said pathway and causing any damage

Evidence:

Further the defendants are to be restrained from reducing the width of said pathway and to commit any waste or to cause any damage to the plaint B schedule way.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification