Case Summary
The petitioners are seeking eviction of the respondents from a shop room they claim to require for a Purdah business. The respondents were absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of respondents from the shop room within one month.
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioners' request for eviction from the shop room, stating the need for conducting business was bonafide.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioners' need for the shop room to conduct business was legitimate and unchallenged.
The court found the petitioners' need for the shop room to conduct business was legitimate and unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petitioners' need for the shop room to conduct business was legitimate and unchallenged.
The court found the petitioners' need for the shop room to conduct business was legitimate and unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
Since the respondents are proceeded exparte and has not challenged the need projected by the petitioners the case of the petitioners succeed and are entitled to claim benefit u/s.11(3) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, an order of eviction is passed u/s. 11(3) of the Act. The respondents are directed to vacate the petition schedule shop room and to hand over the same to the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of this order.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- PATHOOTY. E. V
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- JAMEELA. E. V
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- SUBAIDA. E. V
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- MARIYAM. E. V
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HAMEED
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- ROOPA PAVITHRAN
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- ANGITH
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AMAN
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Agreement entered in between Pavithra Mohan and Petitioners.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Arun Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Aiswarya. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An order of eviction is passed against the respondents to vacate the petition schedule shop room.
Evidence:
The Rent Control Petition is allowed as follows: In the result, an order of eviction is passed u/s. 11(3) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the landlord-tenant relationship and supports the petitioners' claim of bonafide need for the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Bonafide need for own use
Case Code
Case between PATHOOTY. E. V et al vs ROOPA PAVITHRAN et al regarding eviction from petition schedule shop room
Case Code Year
Case between PATHOOTY. E. V et al vs ROOPA PAVITHRAN et al regarding eviction from petition schedule shop room