Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 120/2020

Case between Partner, "Naagaas" vs M/s. Menz City Mens Wear regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-07
Duration
approximately-5 years 20 days
Case Closed
Mon, 07/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Partner of 'Naagaas', a textile dealer, was represented by Suresh N. The defendant, M/s. Menz City Mens Wear, was represented by its proprietor Thomas Kutty. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court despite several postings for evidence. The court deemed that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court despite several postings for evidence. The court deemed that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to attend and provide evidence for the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to attend and provide evidence for the case.
Supporting Evidence
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff remained absent and did not present any proof affidavit, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, the suit is dismissed for default. Pending IA’s closed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Partner, "Naagaas"
Party Age
39
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Menz City Mens Wear
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.T. Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashitha S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John T. Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with the case. Therefore, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Partner, "Naagaas" vs M/s. Menz City Mens Wear regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Partner, "Naagaas" vs M/s. Menz City Mens Wear regarding suit dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/07/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won