Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 120/2020

Case between Partner, "Naagaas" vs M/s. Menz City Mens Wear regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-07
Duration
approximately-5 years 20 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Partner of 'Naagaas', a textile dealer, was represented by Suresh N. The defendant, M/s. Menz City Mens Wear, was represented by its proprietor Thomas Kutty. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court despite several postings for evidence. The court deemed that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to attend and provide evidence for the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, the suit is dismissed for default. Pending IA’s closed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Partner, "Naagaas" (39 years) K.P.K. Towers, Post Office Link Road, Ernakulam -682 031

Defendants

M/s. Menz City Mens Wear (Age not specified years) Piravom, Ernakulam District – 686664

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with the case. Therefore, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/07/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases