Case Summary
Parakkal Muhammed Ali is the petitioner seeking enforcement of a decree, while Chundikattil Abdul Azees is the respondent. The case has been dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
EP
Final Judgment
No
The petition for execution has been dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder's representation.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was not represented in court.
The decree holder was not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was not represented in court.
The decree holder was not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
Since 12.11.2024 Decree Holder has no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parakkal Muhammed Ali
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chundikattil Abdul Azees
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. K.M. Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Raghu Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Abhila A. P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
EP
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Parakkal Muhammed Ali vs Chundikattil Abdul Azees regarding EP
Case Code Year
Case between Parakkal Muhammed Ali vs Chundikattil Abdul Azees regarding EP