Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E. P.280/2023

Case between Pappachan et al vs Joseph et al regarding Execution Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Decree Holders Pappachan and Antony seeking execution against Judgment Debtors Joseph, Alex, Binoy, Jaimon, and Prince. The court found that the Execution Petition was fully satisfied.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the Execution Petition was fully satisfied. Consequently, it was ordered to be closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the Execution Petition was fully satisfied. Consequently, it was ordered to be closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Execution Petition was fully satisfied.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Execution Petition was fully satisfied.
Supporting Evidence
The court passed the order stating that delivery was effected and the EP was fully satisfied.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pappachan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph (Died)
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alex
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binoy
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaimon
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prince
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lalitha G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binla T Thampi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
EP fully satisfied.
Evidence:
Delivery effected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pappachan et al vs Joseph et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Pappachan et al vs Joseph et al regarding Execution Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 07/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Share Wealth Chitts Ltd. vs Paulson Paul et al regarding E.P. No. 27/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between E.No. 307, Kunnathunad Taluk, Housing Co-operative Society represented by Secretary Clency Anto, W/o.Joy vs Varghese et al regarding execution of decree for realization of debt.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Matrix finbiz pvt. Ltd et al vs George Varghese et al regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Matrix Chits (Pvt.) Ltd vs Jini Martin et al regarding Arb.Award No.C 240/2020
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Vengola Service Co operative bank No. 4276 vs Leela Gopi et al regarding dismissal of execution petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Defendant Won