Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) No.113 OF 2016

Case between Pallippurath Ramla vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding loan agreement dispute

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-11-30
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner filed a pauper petition seeking relief against respondents for failure to repay a loan amount of Rs.2,00,000 with interest, as agreed in the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, granting the petitioner relief to file the suit as a pauper.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to file suit as a pauper
Case Type
Civil Suit - Debt Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, granting the petitioner relief to file the suit as a pauper.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner had insufficient means to pay the court fee required by law.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the petitioner had insufficient means to pay the court fee required by law.
Supporting Evidence
Nothing has brought out to show that the petitioner is having sufficient means to pay court fee. Therefore, I find no reason to disbelieve the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition shall be numbered as plaint.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pallippurath Ramla
Party Age
42
Relation
Daughter of Pallippurath Moideen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd
Party Age
36
Relation
Represented by Managing Director Jayachandran, Son of Muthiyeri Vasu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad
Relation
Son of Parangodan
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, Agreement copy
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. .C.Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A.K. Muhammed Zakkariya
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permission to sue as pauper
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to file the suit as a pauper petition
Evidence:
The petition shall be numbered as plaint.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as examination in chief
Reference:
Chief Affidavit filed
Document Type: Agreement Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of loan agreement
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Debt Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Debt recovery
Case Code
Case between Pallippurath Ramla vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding loan agreement dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Pallippurath Ramla vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding loan agreement dispute

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 11/30/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 11/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. vs K.V. Subrahmanyan et al regarding debt recovery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Debt Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary vs Muhammed Kasim Poochakuzhiyil et al regarding debt recovery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Debt Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Randodi Muhammed Basheer et al regarding debt recovery
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Debt Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary vs Asainar et al regarding debt recovery
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Debt Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Salih regarding debt recovery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Debt Recovery Defendant Won