Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.397/2021

Case between Pallickamalil Cinema Company Private Limited vs Gopalakrishnan Pukalakkattu Balakrishnan et al regarding dismissal of the suit.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Pallickamalil Cinema Company Private Limited, represented by its director, Aby Tom a Nicholson, sought relief regarding a building. The defendant did not appear, and the plaintiff stated that the matter has become infructuous as possession of the building was handed over.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed based on the plaintiff's submission that the matter has become infructuous.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence recording his submission, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pallickamalil Cinema Company Private Limited (Age not specified years) Arakkunnam P.O, Ernakulam District, Kerala 682 313

Defendants

Gopalakrishnan Pukalakkattu Balakrishnan (Age not specified years) Pukalakkat Building, Palli Pradakshina Road, Palarivattom, Ernakulam, Kerala 682025 M/s. Abad Builders Private Limited (51 years) 8th Floor, Abad Nucleus Mall and Office Arcade, Kochi Madurai NH-49 Road, Maradu P.O., Kochi 682 304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases