Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 475/2023

Case between Palathara Hill View Flat Owner's Association vs Stanley Varghese regarding recovery of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-17
Duration
approximately-5 years 2 months
Case Closed
Thu, 07/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Palathara Hill View Flat Owner's Association filed a suit against Stanley Varghese for recovery of maintenance charges. The association claims that Varghese has not paid these charges despite using the association's services.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff, stating that the plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. The defendant was held entitled to costs from the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff, stating that the plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. The defendant was held entitled to costs from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was insufficient to establish the claims made in the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was insufficient to establish the claims made in the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint lacks inherent defects and lacks any proper mention as to the arrear due as already stated above. The evidence is also clearly lacking to prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Defendant is entitled to the costs of the suit from the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Palathara Hill View Flat Owner's Association
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stanley Varghese
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of relevant pages of minutes book of Palathara Hill View Flat Owners Association (Subject to Proof), Office copy of Lawyer Notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sebin Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amith K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sain Paul Alunkal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. R Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of maintenance charges from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Minutes Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the relevant pages of minutes book of Palathara Hill View Flat Owners Association submitted subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Minutes Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the relevant pages of minutes book of Palathara Hill View Flat Owners Association submitted subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of Lawyer Notice submitted.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Palathara Hill View Flat Owner's Association vs Stanley Varghese regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Palathara Hill View Flat Owner's Association vs Stanley Varghese regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 05/20/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won