Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 499/2019

Case between Padmakumari et al vs Marykutty Jose et al regarding dismissal of suit not pressed.

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Padmakumari, filed a suit against the defendants, including Marykutty Jose. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after being heard.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiffs filed a not press memo.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiffs filed a not press memo.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

This suit having been finally heard on 12.09.2025 and the court on same day delivered the following. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Padmakumari
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mini Joy
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunil Thomas
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shanti John
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhamma
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Marykutty Jose
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rani
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binoy Chacko
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Purushothaman
Party Age
79
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P V Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P A Rabeez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prasannakumari V R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shamil Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepa Sukumaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Satheesh R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Padmakumari et al vs Marykutty Jose et al regarding dismissal of suit not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Padmakumari et al vs Marykutty Jose et al regarding dismissal of suit not pressed.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Elizabeth Mani et al vs M/s. Coromandel International Ltd., EID – Parry (India) Ltd. regarding property possession
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self-Employers Service Society vs Bindhu Sanil et al regarding Suit dismissal
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Rajesh V. regarding dismissal of suit
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumari Anuranjana Anil vs Deputy Director of Education et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won