Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1084/2016

Case between Padmakumar et al vs Rekha Ramakrishnan et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-06
Duration
approximately-8 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Padmakumar and Chitira Padmakumar, while the defendants are Rekha Ramakrishnan, Sabari, and Biju G. Nair. The case was about a suit that was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs. The court noted that no proof affidavit was filed, resulting in the default dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not represent themselves in court, leading to a lack of evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Padmakumar (50 years) Kalyani, Nilayam Kroor Kara, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk Chitira Padmakumar (45 years) Kalyani Nilayam, Eroor Kara, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Defendants

Rekha Ramakrishnan (43 years) 24/356­C, Springdale Gardens, Market Road, Thripunithura, Kanayannoor Taluk Sabari (40 years) 24/356­D, Springdale Gardens, Market Road, Tripunithura, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk Biju G. Nair (38 years) H.No. 24/356 D, Springdale Gardens, Market Road, Tripunithura

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases