Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST. No: 12/2014

Case between P. Subramanyan vs Zakaria Sadique regarding Cheque Dishonour

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju. V. G.
Order Date
2014-07-31
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complaint filed by P. Subramanyan against Zakaria Sadique under Section 138 of N.I. Act for cheque dishonour resulted in acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused was acquitted based on the permission granted to the complainant to withdraw the complaint.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted based on the permission granted to the complainant to withdraw the complaint.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted. u/s. 257 Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. Subramanyan
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Zakaria Sadique
Party Age
52
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. K. Dinesh. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
Tirur
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. V. Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
Tirur

Reliefs

Relief Type: Acquittal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted
Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted. u/s. 257 Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between P. Subramanyan vs Zakaria Sadique regarding Cheque Dishonour
Case Code Year
Case between P. Subramanyan vs Zakaria Sadique regarding Cheque Dishonour

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 05/28/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/02/2014 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Indira vs Sreeja S regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Gokulam Chit & Finance Co Pvt Ltd vs Asmabi regarding cheque dishonour
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Faisala vs Abdul Latheef regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Aboobacker vs Abdul Rasak regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque dishonour Unknown
Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Plaintiff Won