Case Summary
The case involves P A Sanoj as the plaintiff seeking a declaration of right of way by easement against defendants P K Sreedharan and his sons. The defendants filed a petition for an advocate commissioner to inspect a pathway.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that there was no necessity for further inspection as prior reports had already been submitted and were adequate for consideration.
The court determined that there was no necessity for further inspection as prior reports had already been submitted and were adequate for consideration.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Petition is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
P A Sanoj (48 years years)
Puthussery House, Eroor, Pin- 682306, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk
Defendants
P K Sreedharan (83 years years)
Puthussery House, Eroor, Pin- 682306, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk
Maju (50 years years)
Puthussery House, Eroor, Pin- 682306, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk
Manu (47 years years)
Puthussery House, Eroor, Pin- 682306, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Request for appointment of advocate commissioner to inspect the pathway.
Evidence:
I find no merit in the above petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report of the advocate commissioner was marked to ascertain the status of the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Title deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's documents supporting the claim of right of way through the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A3