Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 54/2022

Case between P. P Roy vs M/s. ABC Motors Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, P. P Roy and Sophi Roy, filed a suit against the defendants, including M/s. ABC Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not present or ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not present or ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 04.03.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Both represented. Listed case. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. P Roy
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sophi Roy
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. ABC Motors Pvt. Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Pulimootil George Mathew
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Oommen Varghese
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Annamma Varghese
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Bhaskaran Nair Kunnel Janardanan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishak K. Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sasi N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sumson T. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff not being present or ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P. P Roy vs M/s. ABC Motors Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence
Case Code Year
Case between P. P Roy vs M/s. ABC Motors Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won