Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.272/2020

Case between P. P. Baby vs A. S. Kochackan et al regarding execution of decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
Case Code No.
272
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P. P. Baby filed an execution petition to enforce a decree against A. S. Kochackan and others for trespassing and obstructing property rights. The court examines the claims of both parties regarding the property boundaries.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the execution petition, enabling the decree holder to proceed with enforcement actions regarding the property boundaries.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the execution petition, enabling the decree holder to proceed with enforcement actions regarding the property boundaries.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the decree holder has the right to enforce the decree based on the commission report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court determined that the decree holder has the right to enforce the decree based on the commission report.
Supporting Evidence
It is revealed that the pathway has a length of 35 metres, with varying width, and a definite boundary exists separating the property of the decree holder and the property of the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the execution petition is allowed as above.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. P. Baby
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A. S. Kochackan
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khadeeja
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A. K. Shaji
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A. K. Salim
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. K. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Enforcement of the decree to prevent the judgment debtor from trespassing and obstructing the execution of the boundary work.
Evidence:
In the above circumstances, Amin is deputed to effect execution of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the commission report to assess the dimensions of the pathway and the existing boundary.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Saji Vargheese vs Vijoy Thomas regarding execution of decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between John N. J. vs Sukumary Gopinadhan et al regarding decree execution
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Matrix finbiz pvt. Ltd et al vs George Varghese et al regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Metro Bankers vs Biju Paul, Poulose C.S regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Perumbavoor Urban Co Operative Society vs Meethinkunju et al regarding execution proceedings
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won