Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 560 /20 21

Case between P P Alex et al vs Jamaludheen regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-09-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P P Alex, represented by his son Nikhin Alex, filed a suit against Jamaludheen for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction in the enjoyment of property rights. The case involves a dispute over the rights to the third floor and amenities of a building.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property and report on the current status, aiding in the fair adjudication of the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner Alex M Jose
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property and report on the current status, aiding in the fair adjudication of the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that allowing the petition will aid in the adjudication of the case and will not cause prejudice to the respondent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that allowing the petition will aid in the adjudication of the case and will not cause prejudice to the respondent.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of petition averments and records in the case, I am convinced that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner will aid the court to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the above discussion, the petition is allowed on the following terms: - 1) Advocate Alex M Jose is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P P Alex
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o late P K Pothen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nikhin Alex
Party Age
21
Relation
S/o P P Alex
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jamaludheen
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o late Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinesh R Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saumya T S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph George A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Silesh S Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lakshmi Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shaheer Ali Mohammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Athin Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the light of the above discussion, the petition is allowed on the following terms: - Advocate Alex M Jose is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Advocate Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The report provided a status of the building and construction at the time of filing the suit.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P P Alex et al vs Jamaludheen regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between P P Alex et al vs Jamaludheen regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won