Case Summary
The petitioner P. Leela filed a petition for amendment of pleading due to counter petitioners installing a gate after an ad interim injunction order. The counter petitioners contested the amendment, stating that the gate already existed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for amendment of pleading, stating that it was necessary for the adjudication of the dispute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was deemed necessary for adjudication and thus allowed.
The petition was deemed necessary for adjudication and thus allowed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Considering the rival contentions and perusing the documents, it is seen that the merits and the correctness of the pleading is not to be looked upon at this stage and the pleadings sought to be incorporated is also seems necessary for the adjudication of the dispute between the parties.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to carry out amendment within 14 days from the date of the order.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P. Leela
- Relation
- W/o late Sasidharan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.R.Thankappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valsala
- Relation
- W/o K.R.Thankappan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.D.Shanavas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Majida.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ajikhan.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Babin.S.Xavier
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Srikesh.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Amendment of pleadings to include subsequent acts committed by the counter petitioners regarding the installation of the gate.
Evidence:
the petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to carry out amendment within 14 days from the date of the order.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022