Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 162/2023

Case between P. K. Kunhali et al vs Nishad. P. K et al regarding arrears of rent

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-12-08
Duration
approximately-7 years 3 months
Case Code No.
162
Case Closed
Mon, 12/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves P. K. Kunhali and others as petitioners against Nishad. P. K and others as respondents regarding the payment of arrears of rent. The court decided on the failure of the respondents to comply with a previous order from the Rent Control Appellate Authority.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondents to pay the arrears of rent or the order would stand vacated. The respondents failed to comply within the specified timeframe.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The court directed to effect the delivery of shop rooms.
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondents to pay the arrears of rent or the order would stand vacated. The respondents failed to comply within the specified timeframe.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents did not comply with the directive of the appellate court regarding payment of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents did not comply with the directive of the appellate court regarding payment of rent.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the order of the appellate court is specific this court cannot grant time to the respondents to deposit the arrears of rent.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Amin is deputed to effect the delivery of shop rooms and to effect delivery.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. K. Kunhali
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
AFSATH
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
NISHAD. P. K
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SALIM. E. K
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
RAIHANATH. P. P
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Padmanabhan Ponnamkot
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Shanavas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Time may be granted to the respondents to deposit the arrears of rent.
Evidence:
Counsel for respondents submit that they have received the certified copy of the order lately therefore a time may be granted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society vs Dharmaraj MM et al regarding decree debt repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Plaintiff Won
Case between IRINGANOOR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK Ltd vs Preman K K regarding decree debt
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Plaintiff Won
Case between KAVILUMPARA RURAL EMPLOYEES & WORKERS WELFARE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. et al vs RILESH. P. K et al regarding matter settled.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Plaintiff Won
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD et al vs KUNHIRAMAN et al regarding default dismissal.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Defendant Won
Case between Vinodan NIRAN V G vs Vijayan regarding EP dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Defendant Won