Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 243 /2025

Case between P K Babu vs Jose Mampilly regarding compromise settlement

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P K Babu filed a suit against Jose Mampilly regarding a financial claim. The parties have reached a compromise which has resulted in the suit being settled.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the compromise between the parties and decreed the suit as per the compromise agreement. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fee.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of Court Fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a lawful compromise which satisfied the court.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 8/25 is allowed. Compromise of suit is recorded. Hence suit is decreed as per compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

P K Babu (61 years years) Thrippadham, Ullas Nagar, Thekkumbagam, Thripunithura

Defendants

Jose Mampilly (60 years years) 4F Paveloan, Paladium Apartments Chutupaddukara, Edappally North Village, 682026, Kanayannur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise of suit is recorded and suit is decreed as per compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence IA 8/25 is allowed. Compromise of suit is recorded. Hence suit is decreed as per compromise agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of Court Fee as per section 69 of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of Court Fee as per section 69 of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases