Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1076/2024

Case between P. Jose Ukkru vs M/s. Systematic Industries Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, P. Jose Ukkru, seeks to recover an amount of Rs.2,34,823.20 from the defendants, M/s. Systematic Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Sidharth Agarwal, due to defective goods supplied under a purchase order. The plaintiff claims the amount was paid as an advance, but the goods were rejected for being rusted.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs.2,34,823 along with interest from the defendants. The defendants are also ordered to bear the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.2,34,823 with 10% annual interest from the date of suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs.2,34,823 along with interest from the defendants. The defendants are also ordered to bear the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the claim with unrebutted oral testimony and supporting evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established the claim with unrebutted oral testimony and supporting evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 (a) to A8 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff. The claim as sought for in the plaint remains unpaid by the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,34,823/- (Rupees Two lakh Thirty Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty Three only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. Jose Ukkru
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Systematic Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sidharth Agarwal
Plaintiffs Documents
Statement of accounts, tax invoice, E-way bill, lorry receipt, rejected invoice, lawyer notice, non-starter report.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G. Cleetus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul N.V.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.2,34,823/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,34,823/- from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 10% per annum on the claimed amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 10% per annum for Rs.2,34,823/- from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the claimed amount from date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.2,34,823/- from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the financial transactions of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice issued by the defendants for the purchase.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: E-way bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting the transportation of goods.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Lorry receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt confirming the delivery of goods.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Rejected invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoice that was returned by the trader due to defective goods.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendants demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Non-starter report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report issued by the District Legal Service Authority regarding mediation.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between P. Jose Ukkru vs M/s. Systematic Industries Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between P. Jose Ukkru vs M/s. Systematic Industries Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/24/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won