Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition. 45/2024 in OS 483/2023

Case between P J Jayaprakash vs Liju C Rajan regarding restoration of dismissed suit

Court
Adll.Munsiff's Court
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-07-02
Duration
approximately-1 year 4 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, P J Jayaprakash, seeks the restoration of a suit that was dismissed due to non-appearance of his counsel. The defendant, Liju C Rajan, contests the petition, alleging lack of bona fides in the original suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration petition, setting aside the earlier dismissal of the suit and ordered it to be restored.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of OS 483/2023
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition, setting aside the earlier dismissal of the suit and ordered it to be restored.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner showed sufficient cause for the non-appearance of his counsel, which was deemed plausible.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner showed sufficient cause for the non-appearance of his counsel, which was deemed plausible.
Supporting Evidence
The cause for non appearance, though opposed appears to be plausible and not entirely unreasonable. The absence of the counsel cannot be said to be wilful or deliberate on the part of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, it is ordered as follows:- 1.The restoration petition is allowed. 2.The order dated 04.03.2024 dismissing OS 483/2023 for default is set aside. 3.OS 483/2023 is restored back to file and shall proceed in accordance with law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P J Jayaprakash
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Liju C Rajan
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anish Ramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prakash Pampady
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The restoration petition is allowed.
Evidence:
In the result, it is ordered as follows:- 1.The restoration petition is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Set Aside
Description:
The order dated 04.03.2024 dismissing OS 483/2023 for default is set aside.
Evidence:
2.The order dated 04.03.2024 dismissing OS 483/2023 for default is set aside.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Restored
Description:
OS 483/2023 is restored back to file and shall proceed in accordance with law.
Evidence:
3.OS 483/2023 is restored back to file and shall proceed in accordance with law.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner shall pay costs of Rs.1,000/- to the respondent as condition of restoration.
Evidence:
4.The petitioner shall pay costs of Rs.1,000/- to the respondent as condition of restoration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P J Jayaprakash vs Liju C Rajan regarding restoration of dismissed suit
Case Code Year
Case between P J Jayaprakash vs Liju C Rajan regarding restoration of dismissed suit

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Dilip K John vs Naisy regarding Restoration Petition
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Biju K Mathew vs Sigtech Marketing Private Limited et al regarding restoration petition
The Principal Munsiff, Kottayam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding Restoration of Petition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding dismissal of restoration petition
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Elsamma Thomas vs Jomy Scaria et al regarding Restoration Petition
The Principal Munsiff, Kottayam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won