Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 603/2022

Case between P C Vijayan et al vs K P Nandakumar et al regarding non-payment of balance court fee

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P C Vijayan and K P Gangadevi filed a suit against K P Nandakumar and Renjini regarding non-payment of court fees. The court rejected the plaint due to the lack of payment for the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the non-payment of balance court fees. All interim orders shall stand vacated.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the non-payment of balance court fees. All interim orders shall stand vacated.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

the plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of civil procedure for non payment of balance court fee

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P C Vijayan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K P Gangadevi
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K P Nandakumar
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjini
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu Thozhuppadan K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajwin P Lalson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Antony Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Devi P Prathapan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amrutha P M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S Leelalakshmi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fee
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of civil procedure for non payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P C Vijayan et al vs K P Nandakumar et al regarding non-payment of balance court fee
Case Code Year
Case between P C Vijayan et al vs K P Nandakumar et al regarding non-payment of balance court fee

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won