Case Summary
The plaintiff, P. C Gireesh, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Markose Ulahannan. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has trespassed into his property and caused damage.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant and men under him are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, destroying the eastern boundary of the plaint schedule property and committing any waste therein.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and causing damage.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that plaintiff has proved his case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (1) The defendant and men under him are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, destroying the eastern boundary of the plaint schedule property and committing any waste therein.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P. C Gireesh
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Markose Ulahannan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Settlement Deed No. 1177/2019 of SRO, Ramapuram, Land Revenue Tax receipt No. KL05042502628/2025
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thomas V. T
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amal Vincent
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Siby Mathew Thakadiyel
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant and men under him are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The defendant and men under him are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, destroying the eastern boundary of the plaint schedule property and committing any waste therein.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's title and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document provides evidence related to the property as assessed by the Adv. Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Rough Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document assists in visualizing the property boundaries as per the commission.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document provides further evidence related to the property assessed by the Adv. Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type:
Survey Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document outlines the survey details of the property under dispute.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P. C Gireesh vs Markose Ulahannan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between P. C Gireesh vs Markose Ulahannan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction