Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 313 /2023

Case between P A Akbar vs Sarada et al regarding suit for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P A Akbar is the plaintiff and Sarada along with others are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was not intending to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was not intending to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Court is satisfied that the plaintiff is not intending to proceed with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P A Akbar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarada
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dileepraj
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dineshraj
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeba
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala State Waqf Board
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji N A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Akbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V A Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naveen A Varkey
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence Court is satisfied that the plaintiff is not intending to proceed with suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P A Akbar vs Sarada et al regarding suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between P A Akbar vs Sarada et al regarding suit for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won