Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 162/2019

Case between Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd vs The Superintendent, General Hospital et al regarding Recovery of Money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
approximately-6 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd filed a suit against The Superintendent of the General Hospital and the Hospital Development Authority for the recovery of unpaid bills for pharmaceutical supplies. Despite multiple demands and legal notices, the defendants failed to make payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs.64,451 from the second defendant, with interest. The first defendant was exonerated from liability due to lack of evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the debt through invoices and legal notices, while the defense failed to provide sufficient evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; (i) The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant and his assets with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of invoices till the date of suit, as well as from the date of suit till the date of decree...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd (Age not specified years) 50/229A, Thiruvonam, Manimala Road, Edappilly.P.O, Kochi -24

Defendants

The Superintendent, General Hospital, (Paying Pharmacy), Thalassery, Kannur District, Pin: 670 101 (Age not specified years) Hospital Development authority, Taluk Hospital, Thalassery (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree for realization of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of invoices till the date of suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant and his assets with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of invoices till the date of suit.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 6% per annum till realization from the date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- ... and thereafter with interest at the rate of 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also allowed to recover costs of the suit from the 2nd defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the 2nd defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certificate of Incorporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the legal existence of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorizes the representative to act on behalf of the company.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a formal demand for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer's notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the resolution marked as Ext.A2.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A3.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A4.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A5.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A6.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A7.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A8.
Reference:
Ext.A17

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Sat, 02/02/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases