Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 162/2019

Case between Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd vs The Superintendent, General Hospital et al regarding Recovery of Money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
approximately-6 years 6 months
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd filed a suit against The Superintendent of the General Hospital and the Hospital Development Authority for the recovery of unpaid bills for pharmaceutical supplies. Despite multiple demands and legal notices, the defendants failed to make payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs.64,451 from the second defendant, with interest. The first defendant was exonerated from liability due to lack of evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs.64,451 from the second defendant, with interest. The first defendant was exonerated from liability due to lack of evidence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the debt through invoices and legal notices, while the defense failed to provide sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Thus the plaintiff has proved his case beyond the preponderance of probabilities. Therefore, the onus of proof on the shoulder of 2nd defendant to prove the discharge of the payment of plaint amount, is not established before this court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; (i) The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant and his assets with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of invoices till the date of suit, as well as from the date of suit till the date of decree...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Superintendent, General Hospital, (Paying Pharmacy), Thalassery, Kannur District, Pin: 670 101
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hospital Development authority, Taluk Hospital, Thalassery
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Certificate of incorporation, resolutions, tax invoices, legal notice, acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.N. Chandra Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Dhanesh Kumar K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.T. Jestin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree for realization of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of invoices till the date of suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- from the 2nd defendant and his assets with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of invoices till the date of suit.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 6% per annum till realization from the date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize an amount of Rs.64,451/- ... and thereafter with interest at the rate of 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also allowed to recover costs of the suit from the 2nd defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the 2nd defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certificate of Incorporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the legal existence of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorizes the representative to act on behalf of the company.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details a specific transaction for pharmaceutical products.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a formal demand for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer's notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the resolution marked as Ext.A2.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A3.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A4.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A5.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A6.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A7.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the invoice marked as Ext.A8.
Reference:
Ext.A17

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd vs The Superintendent, General Hospital et al regarding Recovery of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd vs The Superintendent, General Hospital et al regarding Recovery of Money

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 02/02/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jagen N. Lalan vs Mr.Ratheesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won