Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.665/2017

Case between Omana vs Chandrika et al regarding settlement of mediation

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-02-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Omana filed a suit against Chandrika and Suresh Babu. The matter was settled in mediation, and the mediation agreement was accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in accordance with the mediation agreement, which found the terms lawful and acceptable.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in accordance with the mediation agreement, which found the terms lawful and acceptable.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled in mediation and the terms were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled in mediation and the terms were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled in mediation. Mediation agreement received. Terms are found to be lawful. Accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed accordingly. The terms of agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Omana
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrika
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Babu
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.P.Suraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.Satheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.Ajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed accordingly based on the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Matter settled in mediation. Mediation agreement received. Terms are found to be lawful.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Omana vs Chandrika et al regarding settlement of mediation
Case Code Year
Case between Omana vs Chandrika et al regarding settlement of mediation

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won