Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:32/2014

Case between Oduvil Abdul Rasak vs Mehaboob regarding dishonoured cheque

Court
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Judge
Sri.Biju. V. G, B.Sc, LL.B.
Order Date
2014-06-27
Duration
Less than a year
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant filed a case against the accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonoured cheque. The complainant later sought to withdraw the complaint, resulting in the accused being acquitted.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The accused was acquitted as the complainant sought to withdraw the complaint.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 of N.I. Act)
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted as the complainant sought to withdraw the complaint.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Oduvil Abdul Rasak
Relation
S/o Saithallikutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mehaboob
Relation
S/o Mohammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Shanmughan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri M. G. Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Acquittal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused was acquitted.
Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 of N.I. Act)
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Oduvil Abdul Rasak vs Mehaboob regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Oduvil Abdul Rasak vs Mehaboob regarding dishonoured cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 06/27/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2014 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ashraf vs Shahida regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act Prosecution
Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Kutty Haji regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Cheque Dishonour Case Defendant Won
Case between Indira vs Sreeja S regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between V. Sreejesh vs Dr. Prasanna regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 of N.I. Act) Defendant Won
Case between Mohanan. P.V et al vs Sreelakha. C P et al regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 of N.I. Act) Defendant Won