Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.250/2021

Case between N.Vijaya Kumar Ilayathu vs Balachandran et al regarding suit and counter claim

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 03/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N.Vijaya Kumar Ilayathu is the plaintiff, while Balachandran, Pradeep, Suresh Kumar, Anil Kumar, and Mohanan Nair are the defendants. The case involved a suit and a counter claim, which were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and no court fee being paid.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit and counter claim were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the required court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit and counter claim were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the required court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The dismissal was based on the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of payment of the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The dismissal was based on the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of payment of the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
No application seen filed seeking time for remitting balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit and counter claim shall stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.Vijaya Kumar Ilayathu
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balachandran
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep
Party Age
47
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Kumar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan Nair
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Satheesh Babu.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Punchakkari M. Prabhakaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Ayyappan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit and counter claim dismissed due to lack of representation and no remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence suit and counter claim shall stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.Vijaya Kumar Ilayathu vs Balachandran et al regarding suit and counter claim
Case Code Year
Case between N.Vijaya Kumar Ilayathu vs Balachandran et al regarding suit and counter claim

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 03/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won