Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No. 07/2024

Case between N.T Najeeb et al vs Pamboden Noushad regarding Commercial Suit

Court
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Judge
Sri.Krishnankutty.K.V
Order Date
2025-03-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include N.T Najeeb and three others, while the defendant is Pamboden Noushad. The case is about a commercial suit that was heard but ultimately faced issues due to lack of representation from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to no representation from the plaintiff and non-payment of fees, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to no representation from the plaintiff and non-payment of fees, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to lack of representation and non-payment of required fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to lack of representation and non-payment of required fees.
Supporting Evidence
No representation for plaintiff. No BCF paid for several postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.T Najeeb
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rasiya .N.T
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mumthaz. N.T
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajitha. N.T
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pamboden Noushad
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.M.Musthafa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.V.G.Neena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.A.Sajeed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Ameer Ali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Sruthi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Fazal.M.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.T Najeeb et al vs Pamboden Noushad regarding Commercial Suit
Case Code Year
Case between N.T Najeeb et al vs Pamboden Noushad regarding Commercial Suit

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mohandas vs Mahesh Balasaheb Patil regarding realisation of money
The Court of the Commercial Judge/ 1st Addl.Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Bhumi Integrated Property Management Services et al vs Dr.K.R.Sarath chandran et al regarding rejection of plaint.
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jalaja Prakash et al vs N.K Muhammed Riyas regarding suit dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anjali V.P et al regarding settlement in Adalath.
THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cheriya Thaithottathil Subaida et al vs Mohammed Abdul Ansari regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ 1st ADDL.SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won