Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1247/2020

Case between N.Subramanian et al vs R. Rajalekshmy et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
Case Code No.
1247
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, N.Subramanian and R.Saraswathy, are involved in a case against the defendants, R. Rajalekshmy and Radhakrishnan. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were absent and did not have any representation. There were no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were absent and did not have any representation. There were no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.Subramanian
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R.Saraswathy
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R. Rajalekshmy
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishnan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Williams
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ajunkrishna U.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Kesavankutty Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won