Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1090/2018

Case between N.S.Anilkumar vs Sasikumaran regarding declaration of title and possession over property

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-02-17
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 month
Case Closed
Mon, 02/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N.S.Anilkumar filed a suit against Sasikumaran seeking declaration of title and possession over certain properties. The case involves claims of encroachment and the need for an injunction against the defendant from trespassing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, declaring his title and possession over the property. The defendant was ordered to refrain from trespassing and to dismantle any unauthorized structure.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is restrained from trespassing into the plaint A or B schedule properties and is ordered to dismantle the structure in plaint B schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, declaring his title and possession over the property. The defendant was ordered to refrain from trespassing and to dismantle any unauthorized structure.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established title and possession over the plaint A schedule property and proved encroachment by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established title and possession over the plaint A schedule property and proved encroachment by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of plaintiff remains unchallenged. There is no reason to disbelieve PW1. From the available evidence, the plaintiff is entitled to declare that the plaintiff has title and possession over the plaint A schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed as follows: (i) It is declared that the plaintiff has title and possession over the plaint A schedule property inclusive of the plaint B schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.S.Anilkumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikumaran
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Sale Deed No. 1878/1970, Award Notices in LAC.No.80/981, Original Tax Receipt, Original Form For Sanction of Refusal of a Building Permit/Development Permit, True copy of Building permit, Commencement Certificate issued by Thiruvananthapuram Development Authority (TRIDA)
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Jalaja Saisree
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of title and possession over the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has title and possession over the plaint A schedule property inclusive of the plaint B schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restriction on the defendant from trespassing or erecting structures on the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
The defendant is restrained by a decree of injunction from trespassing into the plaint A or B schedule properties.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction to dismantle and remove the structure in the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to dismantle and remove the structure that he has commenced to construct in the plaint B schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission for the plaintiff to construct a boundary wall on the southern boundary of the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to construct a boundary wall or fence on the southern boundary of the plaint B schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff permitted to realise the cost of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise the cost of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1878/1970 establishes the plaintiff's title over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Award Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Award notices related to compensation for land acquired, relevant to establishing the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt supports the plaintiff's claim of possession over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Building Permit Request
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Form for sanction/refusal of a building permit indicates the plaintiff's intentions regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Building Permit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of building permit demonstrates the plaintiff's right to construct on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commencement Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Commencement certificate verifies legal allowance for construction on the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report details the findings related to the plaint schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report and Photos
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and photos provide visual evidence related to the encroachment on the claim.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.S.Anilkumar vs Sasikumaran regarding declaration of title and possession over property
Case Code Year
Case between N.S.Anilkumar vs Sasikumaran regarding declaration of title and possession over property

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 02/17/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 02/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won