O.S No. 539/2025

Case between Noble George et al vs Sugheer G C regarding breach of sale agreement

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Nanda Krishna M.

Order Date

2025-07-29

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Noble George and Anupama Noble, allege that the defendant, Sugheer G C, has failed to complete a land sale agreement dated July 17, 2024. They claim the defendant is attempting to sell the property to someone else, despite their readiness to fulfill the payment terms of the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the petition for a prohibitory injunction as the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case. The court found that no agreement for specific performance was sought and that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate any irreparable injury.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to substantiate their claim for an injunction or show readiness to perform under the agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Noble George (42 years years) Kootungal house, Thekkumbhagam P.O, Sreemoolanagaram village, Aluva taluk, Ernakulam District – 683 580 Anupama Noble (37 years years) Kootungal house, Thekkumbhagam P.O, Sreemoolanagaram village, Aluva Taluk, Ernakulam District – 683 580

Defendants

Sugheer G C (50 years years) Navaneetham house, M.G.N Nagar, Pallichal Panchayath, Nemom P.O, Pallichal village, Neyyattinkara taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District – 695 920

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Prayer for temporary prohibitory injunction.

Evidence:

Hence, the point is found against the petitioner, the petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Draft Sale Agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

True copy of the draft Sale agreement sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff’s email.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

True copy of the e-mail sent by the 1st plaintiff to the defendant.

Reference:

Ext.A2

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

True copy of the e-mail sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.A3

Document Type: Sale Agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

True copy of the Sale agreement.

Reference:

Ext.A4

Document Type: Sale deed

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

True copy of the Sale deed no. 3659/24 of Edappally SRO.

Reference:

Ext.A5

Document Type: Statement of Accounts

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Statement of accounts showing the transaction of Sale consideration.

Reference:

Ext.A6

Document Type: WhatsApp Screenshot

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the screenshot of the WhatsApp message sent by the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.B1

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the 1st plaintiff to the defendant.

Reference:

Ext.B2

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.B3

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the 1st plaintiff to the defendant.

Reference:

Ext.B4

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.B5

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the 1st plaintiff to the defendant.

Reference:

Ext.B6

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.B7

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the 1st plaintiff to the defendant.

Reference:

Ext.B8

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.B9

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.B10

Document Type: Email Communication

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Copy of the email sent by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.B11

Document Type: Sketch of Property

Submitted By: Defendant

Relevance:

Sketch of the property prepared by the parties at the time of registration showing the 6.9 cents registered as also the balance property to be registered.

Reference:

Ext.B12

Document Type: Commission Report

Submitted By: Court

Relevance:

Commission Report filed by Adv.Abhishek T.M.

Reference:

Ext.C1

Case between Noble George et al vs Sugheer G C regarding breach of sale agreement

Judgement document from eCourt website

Case Summary

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Reliefs

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Involved Entities

Similar Cases