O.S No. 612/2022

Case between Nobimol Joseph vs C.P.Mohan et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Nanda Krishna M.

Order Date

2025-08-11

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Nobimol Joseph as the plaintiff and C.P.Mohan and Gigy Kesavan as defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court has dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear or provide adequate representation.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear or provide adequate representation.

Supporting Evidence

The court ruled that the plaintiff was not ready for adducing evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit was dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Nobimol Joseph
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: C.P.Mohan
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Gigy Kesavan
Party Age: 65
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: R.Muraleekrishnan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Binu K.B
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: B.Deepak
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Karthik Bhavadasan
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Plaintiff's suit is dismissed for default.

Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Partly Granted

Description:

IA 4/25 filed by the defendant is allowed in part.