Case Summary
Petition to evict respondents from building due to non-payment of rent after death of original tenant. Respondents denied petitioner's title over the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) & 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Denial of petitioner's title by respondents found bonafide. Referred parties to competent civil court for adjudication.
Key Reasoning:
Denial of petitioner's title considered bonafide.
Denial of petitioner's title considered bonafide.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Denial of petitioner's title considered bonafide.
Denial of petitioner's title considered bonafide.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.K.Narayanankutty
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o. P.K.Krishnankutty Menon
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt.Sumathy Subramanian
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o. Subramanian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.Rajeev
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o. Subramanian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.Sajeev
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o, Subramanian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Satheesh
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o. Subramanian
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of partition deed No. 1529/1972
Defendants Documents
Property tax assessment lists, original electoral card, demand notices, property tax receipts
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sidhardh P. Sasi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Balaram S.A.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shibu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Paul S. Manguzha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fadil Fazil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh R. Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anjali N.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Saumya T.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition filed to evict the respondents from petition schedule building
Evidence:
This is petition filed to evict the respondents from petition schedule building under u/Secs.11(2)(b) and 11(3) Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act,1965 (in short, The Act).
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) & 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.K.Narayanankutty vs et al regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act,1965
Case Code Year
Case between N.K.Narayanankutty vs et al regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act,1965