Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 10 / 2023

Case between NK Rajesh vs Valappil Thazhath Manoj Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K.
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, NK Rajesh, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against Valappil Thazhath Manoj Kumar and others, claiming obstruction to access his property. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims about the property boundaries and access rights are false.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by NK Rajesh, ruling that he was not entitled to a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants due to lack of evidence establishing his claims.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by NK Rajesh, ruling that he was not entitled to a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants due to lack of evidence establishing his claims.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
In the absence of identification of plaint B schedule property, this court is not justified in granting injunction in respect of plaint B schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed. Parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
NK Rajesh
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valappil Thazhath Manoj Kumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moosari Vayalil Ramakrishnan
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lathika
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ratheesh
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rekha
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Jenmam sale deed No. 1816/2008, Land tax receipt issued by Elathur Village Officer to NK Rajesh, Sketch No.1751/22 prepared by Elathur Village Officer.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of settlement deed no.5131/06 of SRO, Kakkodi executed by Kamala and another in favour of Manoj Kumar, Copy of Joint ozhimuri assignment deed No.1772/13 of SRO, Kakkodi executed by VT Lathika and others in favour of VT Manoj Kumar.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.KP Mayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.PN Sreeraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Premdeep Mahesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenmam assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's purchase of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the plaintiff's ownership of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Illustrates the layout of the properties in question.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes the defendants’ claim of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Joint ozhimuri assignment deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supports the defendants' argument regarding the property transfer.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provides additional evidence regarding the defendants' ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Serves as proof of the defendant's property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further proof of the defendant’s ownership and connection to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details the findings of the property inspection relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation of the commission report findings.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between NK Rajesh vs Valappil Thazhath Manoj Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between NK Rajesh vs Valappil Thazhath Manoj Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won